2011-10-07



As nmh uses git for version  control,  I  (actually  a  mercurial
user) stay with it.

From the user's perspective, git is more complex than  mercurial.
The modular man page approach is appealing.  Also, the stage area
eases commiting sometimes.  But as I already think that mercurial
has  too  many  features, git is worse.  Okay, it was created for
Linux development, and thus surely is well suited therefore,  but
I  believe  it  might  not automatically be suited for less-than-
50,000-SLOC projects. Also, git  implies  a  particuar  community
working style, common to the development of Linux.

You see, I'm not really happy with git, but I get along.



http://marmaro.de/lue/        markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>