2011-10-05 While reading the Nroff/Troff User's Manual in the updated ver- sion for the Heirloom documentation tools, I discovered some may-be inconsistencies. I started to prepare a patch. This of course involved digging through the troff code of the document. To be honest: It's plain awful! :-) This is mainly caused by not using any preprocessors or macro packages -- everything is plain troff. But I also wonder if it's sometimes the result of aiming for perfect results. In perfecting the last 10% of the generated output, one clutters the sources by 90%. Probably this isn't worth it, but I'm not sure about my opinion. (Anyway, in this case we must not forget that the document acts as a show case for troff's capabilities, too.) Reading the manual on paper, however, revealed more information than I could gather from reading it on screen. I probably read slower and deeper when I read on paper. This appears to be ori- ginated in the kind of information processing typical for the two types of media. On paper: lots of novels; linear reading style; never skip sentences. On screen: Huge masses of information; often non-linear reading style; often skip sections. Hence, if you want to get all the contents, print it. :-) http://marmaro.de/lue/ markus schnalke